[Films] Skyfall
Bond is back! Hurrah! I’ve been a fan of the series
for a long time, and have really enjoyed the two most recent films starring
Daniel Craig. These were something of a ‘reboot’ for the series, and were
clearly influenced by the gritty and realistic Bourne films. Craig’s third
outing as the eponymous secret agent marks the 50th anniversary for
the franchise, but is it up to scratch?
Skyfall marks the 50th anniversary of James Bond. (Credit: facebook fan page)
The international teaser poster for the film shows Daniel Craig in full-on 'brooding
and purposeful' mode. (Credit: 007.com)
This time around we see a different aspect. Craig is still
excellent, but more of the humour and playfulness has found its way back into
the character, particularly during his interactions with other characters. In
the field his portrayal is as ruthless and uncompromising as ever, but the
double entendres are back in a big way.
I was quite strongly reminded of Timothy Dalton’s Bond. The big departure
is an acknowledgement of Bond’s weaknesses. He’s shown to be slowing down,
mentally suspect, and not cut out for field duty. Yet Judi Dench’s M still
sends him into the line of fire, where naturally he acquits himself well.
Speaking of Dame Judi Dench, she is as excellent as
ever in her role. Her M has been a perfect match for Craig’s Bond, in as far as
she is as uncompromising as he is, and will do anything and everything
necessary to fulfill the mission. In this case it leads to Bond being shot! It
was slightly odd that for large parts of the film she was the de facto Bond
girl, but watching her get her hands dirty with booby traps and fighting bad
guys was a lot of fun.
The full poster shows Bond, the girl, the bad guy, and.....a mystery character who's
a blast from the past. No spoilers! (Credit: blackactors.net)
As well as the wisecracks, lots of other old habits
have crept back in. There’s plenty of over-the-top action for example,
particularly during the final act that’s set at the titular Skyfall House. And
when you stop to think about it, not a lot actually happens during the course
of the film. There’s just lots of shooting, chasing, and blowing stuff up.
There are also some character and franchise developments that are clearly
telegraphed, which is a shame. The big reveal at the end, for example, was
something that I’d figured out as soon as it was made clear it would happen.
Being an anniversary, there are of course several nods
to the history of the franchise. However these don’t always manifest or
conclude how you would expect. For example, the original Aston Martin from
Goldmember turns up, but is completely destroyed by the end of the film. And an
old character makes a return, from a slightly unexpected angle.
Bond's looking old, but he's as sharp as ever. (Credit: hollywoodreporter.com)
It might sound as though I’m a bit down on this film,
but it’s nitpicking really, and done out of love. I really, really enjoyed
Skyfall, and was grinning almost the entire way through the film. It’s a worthy
addition to the Bond series, and anyone who enjoyed the previous films will
find plenty to like about this latest installment.
Comments
Post a Comment